Individual communication and poster proposals are evaluated according to the following criteria:

  • Adequacy with the issue of the axis and the importance of the subject/question/research problem;
  • Clarity of the problem;
  • Clarity of methodology;
  • Research design if it is an empirical study, including clearly stated questions, data sources, data collection, and analysis procedures;
  • Theoretical or conceptual framework, if applicable, including integration of the subject into current thinking, clear exposition of the subject and its contribution to the scientific literature;
  • Clarity and structure of the proposal;
  • Presence of a conclusion or research results.

Symposium proposals are evaluated based on the following criteria:

  • Clarity of the summary;
  • Adequacy with the problematic of the axis;
  • Concordance of keywords (3 to 5) with the summary;
  • Identification of communicators;
  • Consistency and complementarity of the various communications.

Round table proposals are evaluated based on the following criteria:

  • Name of presenters;
  • Clarity of the theme of the round table;
  • Clarity of the summary;
  • Adequacy with the problematic of the axis;
  • Adoption of a comparative approach;
  • Time allocated to each presenter;
  • Schedule indicating the public participation period.

Abstracts of communication, poster, round table, and symposium will be published on the forum website. It is therefore recommended that particular care be taken in drafting summaries.